All postsCredit Report Errors

Why Is My Trial Payment Being Reported as Delinquent?

Noah Kane, Esq.· Admitted NY, NJ, MD· July 31, 2026

You made every trial modification payment on time and your credit report still says you're late. Here's why servicers do it — and when it violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Quick answer: If you are making payments under a trial modification and your mortgage still reports as delinquent, that is usually deliberate. Trial period plan (TPP) letters routinely contain fine print saying the servicer "will continue to report the delinquency status of your loan." What that fine print may not say is that federal credit reporting standards also require the servicer to report that you are in a trial plan. When a servicer reports the delinquency but omits the trial-plan status, the resulting credit file can be inaccurate or materially misleading — and courts have allowed Fair Credit Reporting Act claims to proceed on exactly that theory. Kane Law Firm LLC filed suit over one of these letters in federal court in New Jersey on July 21, 2026.

You did everything they asked. Your credit still tanked.

The pattern is almost always the same. You fall behind on your mortgage or just need some relief. You apply for help. The servicer sends you a package — a Trial Period Plan, or a "Trial Modification" — and tells you that if you make three (or four, or six) reduced payments on time, they will make the modification permanent.

You make every payment. On time. Sometimes early.

Then you check your credit report and your mortgage is reporting 30, 60, 90, 120+ days past due — and climbing every month you keep paying.

Your score drops fifty, eighty, a hundred and forty points. The auto loan you were pre-approved for evaporates. Your credit card limits get slashed. A landlord or an employer runs you and sees a mortgage in serious default. And nobody at the servicer can explain it, because the front-line representative is reading the same script you already read.

You are not confused, and you did not miss a payment. You are looking at a reporting practice built into the servicing industry's own form letters.

The fine print that explains it

Here is the paragraph. This is the exact text, quoted verbatim from a trial modification letter now on file in the public record of a federal lawsuit our firm filed in the District of New Jersey:

"Credit Reporting: Please note that we will continue to report the delinquency status of your loan to credit reporting agencies as well as your entry into a Trial Modification in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Consumer Data Industry Association requirements. For any property located in a federally declared disaster area, please note that we suspend reporting to all credit reporting agencies for the duration of the Trial Modification. CREDIT SCORING COMPANIES MAY CONSIDER WHETHER THERE IS AN INCREASED CREDIT RISK DUE TO THE LACK OF REPORTING. WE ARE UNCERTAIN AS TO THE IMPACT ON YOUR CREDIT SCORE, PARTICULARLY IF YOU ARE CURRENT ON YOUR MORTGAGE OR OTHERWISE HAVE A GOOD CREDIT SCORE."

Read the first sentence again, slowly. It contains two promises, not one:

  1. the servicer will report the delinquency status of the loan, and
  2. the servicer will report your entry into a Trial Modification.

The first half is confusing at best. The second half is the part that is supposed to protect you — and in our experience it is the part that frequently does not make it onto the credit file.

Now look at the rest of the paragraph, the part in capital letters. It warns the borrower about the risk of a "LACK OF REPORTING" — that is, the risk that nothing gets reported — and says the servicer is "UNCERTAIN AS TO THE IMPACT ON YOUR CREDIT SCORE, PARTICULARLY IF YOU ARE CURRENT ON YOUR MORTGAGE."

Read as a whole, the paragraph tells a borrower to brace for a reporting freeze. It nowhere warns that a homeowner who pays exactly what the servicer demands will watch a 30-day late roll into 60, then 90, then 120. That gap between what the letter says and what the credit file does is the heart of the case.

This is a form letter, not a one-off

The letter at issue in our lawsuit carries an internal form code in its footer: LM024. The complaint alleges that the letter bears the version code "LM024 025 G1 V12," while the Mortgage Assistance Program Evaluation Summary enclosed with it bears an earlier version, "LM024 025 G1 V6" — meaning LM024 is a version-controlled form in ongoing use across a servicing platform, not a document typed up for one borrower.

The complaint further alleges that every servicing letter in the case directs qualified written requests and notices of error to Ewing, New Jersey — specifically to 425 Phillips Blvd., Ewing, NJ 08618 and to P.O. Boxes 77404, 77408, and 77423 in Ewing — and that the plaintiff's Experian and TransUnion files listed Ewing, New Jersey addresses as the point of contact for the mortgage tradeline.

425 Phillips Blvd., Ewing, NJ 08618 is the publicly listed corporate address of Cenlar FSB, the country's largest mortgage subservicer.

What a subservicer is, and why the name on your letterhead is not who services your loan

A subservicer is the company that actually runs your loan. It takes the payments, staffs the phone lines, mails the loss-mitigation letters, and — critically — transmits the monthly tradeline data to Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion on behalf of whichever lender's name is printed at the top of the page.

Cenlar is enormous, and it is not a household name precisely because it never appears on the marketing. Some potential publicly reported scale and relationships:

  • In February 2026, Pennymac announced it was acquiring Cenlar's subservicing business — approximately $740 billion in unpaid principal balance, roughly 2 million loans, and about 100 institutional clients. The deal is expected to close in the second half of 2026.
  • In April 2025, United Wholesale Mortgage (UWM) publicly announced it was moving the majority of its servicing business to Cenlar after ending its relationship with Mr. Cooper. UWM's borrower servicing portal is hosted on Cenlar's own loanadministration.com platform.
  • loanDepot.com, LLC and Cenlar are parties to a publicly filed Amended and Restated Subservicing Agreement dated December 1, 2020.
  • Bank and credit-union lenders including Renasant Bank and Texas Capital Bank publicly direct their mortgage-servicing customers to Cenlar.
  • CMG Mortgage, Inc. is the defendant lender in our case; the complaint alleges its loss-mitigation, payment-processing, and borrower-correspondence operations for the loan at issue ran out of Ewing, New Jersey.

That is a partial list — with roughly 100 institutional clients, the full one is much longer. Which is the point: you cannot tell from your lender's name whether you are on this platform. You tell from the mail.

If you are a New Jersey homeowner and the servicing correspondence on your mortgage routes to Ewing, that also matters legally: the conduct is happening in this state, in this district.

Cenlar is already under a federal regulator's order

This is not an obscure company with a clean file. On October 26, 2021, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency issued a consent order against Cenlar FSB, finding that the bank failed to establish effective controls and risk management practices related to its mortgage servicing and subservicing activities. Among other things, the order barred Cenlar from taking on new subservicing clients without the OCC's non-objection and restricted dividends.

A regulator does not restrict a company's ability to accept new business over a paperwork problem.

What "delinquency status" actually means on a credit report

Mortgage tradelines are reported monthly using the Metro 2 format, the credit industry's standard data layout. Two fields matter here.

The first is the account status, which is driven by the date of first delinquency and the oldest unpaid contractual installment. Because a trial modification payment is less than your contractual payment, the servicer typically credits your trial payment without ever curing the oldest unpaid installment. The result is a delinquency that does not stand still — it rolls forward. Every month you comply, the "past due" bucket gets deeper. Homeowners describe watching their report go from 60 days, to 90, to 120, to "charge-off risk," while paying exactly what the servicer asked.

The second field is the special comment code — the small, standardized flag that tells the bureaus and anyone scoring the file that the account is in a workout or trial plan. The Consumer Data Industry Association has published guidance for years directing furnishers to flag loss-mitigation accounts, and guidance going back to the HAMP era told servicers to report both the delinquency and the workout status, so the file would show a borrower who is "current on a modified payment" rather than a borrower who simply stopped paying.

The delinquency without the flag is a problem. Standing alone, it says: this person defaulted and is doing nothing about it. With the flag, it says: this person defaulted, entered a workout, and is performing. Those describe two very different borrowers, and lenders treat them very differently.

Courts have taken this seriously

This is not a novel theory.

In Chaitoff v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 79 F.4th 800 (7th Cir. 2023), the Seventh Circuit addressed a mortgage reported as delinquent while the borrower was performing under a trial modification, with no notation of the trial plan. The court recognized that a technically accurate delinquency can still be materially misleading to a creditor reading the file when the trial-plan context is omitted — and that a consumer can pursue FCRA claims on that basis.

In Pittman v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 901 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2018), the Sixth Circuit allowed claims to proceed where payments made under a trial plan were reported as past due, and made clear that a furnisher's investigation duty under the FCRA is a substantive one — not a rubber stamp of whatever is already in its system.

The takeaway from both: "we told you in the fine print" is not a defense. Disclosure of an intent to report is not the same thing as reporting accurately.

Which federal laws are in play

  • 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b) — credit reporting agencies must follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information they report about you.
  • 15 U.S.C. § 1681i — when you dispute an item, the bureau must conduct a reasonable reinvestigation, not merely parrot back the furnisher's response.
  • 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(b) — once a bureau forwards your dispute, the furnisher (the servicer or lender) must conduct its own reasonable investigation and correct or delete inaccurate or incomplete information. This duty is triggered by a dispute filed with the bureau, which is why the dispute step below is not optional.
  • 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681n and 1681o — willful violations expose a defendant to statutory damages of $100 to $1,000 per violation plus punitive damages; negligent violations expose them to actual damages. Both provisions shift attorney's fees and costs to the defendant, which is why a case like this costs you nothing out of pocket.
  • New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq. — depending on the facts, deceptive servicing conduct directed at a New Jersey homeowner may also support a state-law claim carrying treble damages and fee-shifting.

There is generally a two-year window from when you discover the violation (and no more than five years from the violation itself) to bring an FCRA claim. Waiting is expensive.

Kane Law Firm filed suit over this exact letter

On July 21, 2026, Kane Law Firm LLC filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Trenton Vicinage, on behalf of a New Jersey homeowner:

Burke v. CMG Mortgage, Inc., Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union LLC, and Equifax Information Services LLC, No. 3:26-cv-9022 (D.N.J.)

The complaint opens with a single sentence that sums up the problem:

"This case is about a mortgage servicer that punishes homeowners for doing exactly what it tells them to do."

Our client received the trial modification package containing the credit-reporting paragraph quoted above, made his trial payments, and watched his mortgage report as progressively more delinquent anyway. The suit names the furnisher and all three national credit bureaus.

Burke v. CMG Mortgage, Inc., No. 3:26-cv-9022 (D.N.J.) — complaint (PDF)

We are actively investigating whether the same reporting practice extends to other loan portfolios serviced out of Ewing, New Jersey, regardless of whose brand is on the letterhead.

What to do right now

1. Preserve the letter. Find the trial modification package — the whole thing, envelope included if you have it. The form code in the footer and the PO box in the correspondence section are evidence. Photograph or scan every page.

2. Pull all three reports, not one. Get your Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion files directly (annualcreditreport.com is the free federal source). Servicers do not always furnish identical data to all three, and the differences between them are frequently the most revealing part of the case.

3. Save proof of every trial payment. Bank statements, cancelled checks, confirmation numbers, the servicer's own payment history. The strength of the case is the contrast between perfect performance and worsening reporting.

4. Dispute in writing with the bureaus — not with the servicer. This step is what legally activates the furnisher's investigation duty under § 1681s-2(b). Mail it, keep a copy, and use certified mail with return receipt. Be specific: state that you are performing under a trial modification and that the tradeline fails to reflect that status. Do not use the servicer's own online dispute portal for this purpose.

5. Keep the denials. If you were turned down for credit, given a worse rate, denied a refinance, or had a limit cut, keep the adverse action notice. That paper is what turns a technical violation into real damages.

Frequently asked questions

Is it legal for my servicer to report me late while I'm making trial payments?

Reporting a delinquency that genuinely exists is not automatically unlawful. The problem arises when the servicer reports the delinquency but misled you about it via a confusing letter, or omits the fact that you are performing under a trial modification. Federal appellate courts have recognized that an omission of that kind can render an otherwise accurate report materially misleading and can support a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

The letter told me they would report the delinquency. Doesn't that mean I agreed to it?

Not necessarily. A disclosure that a company intends to report something does not authorize it to report that thing inaccurately or incompletely. Notably, the same paragraph also promises to report "your entry into a Trial Modification" — so the letter itself commits the servicer to the very notation that is frequently missing.

Why does my past-due amount keep growing even though I pay every month?

Because the trial payment is smaller than your contractual payment, it typically does not cure the oldest unpaid installment. The delinquency rolls forward month over month, so a homeowner who is fully compliant with the trial plan can watch the reported delinquency deepen from 30 to 60 to 90 to 120 days.

Who is Cenlar, and why does a New Jersey address appear on my mortgage correspondence?

Cenlar FSB is the nation's largest mortgage subservicer, with a publicly listed corporate address at 425 Phillips Blvd., Ewing, NJ 08618. Many lenders do not service their own loans; they hire a subservicer to collect payments, handle correspondence, and furnish the monthly data to the credit bureaus. Public reporting indicates Cenlar subservices roughly 2 million loans for about 100 institutional clients, including UWM and loanDepot. That is why letters from unrelated lenders can carry identical language and route written requests to the same Ewing, New Jersey addresses.

How do I tell who actually services my loan?

Look at the mail, not the logo. Check where the letter tells you to send a qualified written request or a notice of error, check the payment address, and check the small alphanumeric form code usually printed in the footer or margin. Then check the "address for this account" listed on your credit report — as alleged in our case, that field can point to the subservicer even when the tradeline is branded with the lender's name.

What can I recover, and what does a lawyer cost?

Available remedies can include correction of the credit file, actual damages (including denied or costlier credit and emotional distress), statutory damages of $100 to $1,000 per willful violation, and in exceptional cases punitive damages. The FCRA is a fee-shifting statute, so attorney's fees and costs are recoverable from the defendant. Kane Law Firm LLC handles these cases on a contingency basis and fronts all costs — you pay nothing out of pocket.

Talk to a New Jersey FCRA lawyer

If your mortgage is reporting as delinquent while you are performing under a trial modification — especially if your letter carries an LM024 form code, or directs correspondence to 425 Phillips Blvd. or a P.O. Box in Ewing, New Jersey — we want to see it.

Kane Law Firm LLC
E: noah@njconsumer.com

Send us the trial modification letter and your credit reports. The review is free and there is never a fee unless we recover.

Attorney advertising. Noah Kane is admitted in New Jersey (No. 428282023), New York (No. 6009682), and Maryland (No. 2603021010). This article is general information about consumer protection law, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Allegations described in pending litigation are allegations only and have not been proven; no defendant has been adjudicated liable. References to companies other than the named defendants are for the purpose of describing publicly reported servicing relationships and are not allegations of wrongdoing by those companies.

Practice area

FCRA Attorney — Credit Report Errors

Sue the credit bureaus and furnishers under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Learn more
Related reading

Think you have a case?

Free, confidential review. You'll talk to a lawyer.

Disclaimer

This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Kane Law Firm, LLC or any of its attorneys. Laws vary by state and change over time, and the application of the law to any specific situation depends on the particular facts. Do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read here without consulting a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. Contacting us through this website, by email, or by phone does not create an attorney-client relationship; that relationship is formed only by a signed written engagement agreement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This material may be considered attorney advertising under the rules of some jurisdictions.

Call 908-4-CREDIT — Free Consultation